UM NCAA penalties
Posted
#319991
(In Topic #45117)
VIP DONOR
Member since 2008
Miami receives loss of 12 scholarships in NCAA infractions case | Dr. Saturday - Yahoo Sports
Now let's see if we can get at least one (1) OF THOSE NINE SCHOLLYS LOST TO COME HERE INSTEAD!
Go get 'em Coaches!
Posted
Administrator
Member since 2006
Posted
Wise Owl
Member since 2012
Rick said
Too light…It's three per year over three seasons…nine per year for three seasons would be more appropriate!Posted On: Oct 22nd 2013, 2:06 PM #319992
I disagree…I am NOT a Canes fan by any measure but an investigation that lasted over 2.5 years caused severe collateral damage (every single school recruiting against them bringing this up). In addition, they voluntarily did not participate in two bowls and the ACC Title game. Also, I believe they self imposed scholarship reductions during the investigation.
Anyone who is a college sports fan of any school should be very nervous about how this investigation was handled and drawned out by the NCAA…and the main witness being someone who is going to be locked up for 40+ years. The Canes deserve punishment, and I think they received fair punishment.
Posted
Wise Owl
Member since 2011
Posted
Administrator
Member since 2006
SMU.
Size it up, line it up, and please explain to me how this is fair and just given the above.
Posted
Wise Owl
Member since 2003
Posted
Administrator
Member since 2006
The 1987 season was canceled.
All home games in 1988 were canceled.
The team's existing probation was extended to 1990.
Its existing ban from bowl games and live television was extended to 1989.
SMU lost 55 new scholarship positions over 4 years.
The team was allowed to hire only five full-time assistant coaches instead of the typical nine.
No off-campus recruiting was permitted until August 1988.
No paid visits could be made to campus by potential recruits until the start of the 1988–89 school year.
Granted they were on probation at the time, but it's not even close to being fair.
Miami was not hurt by refraining from playing in the post season.
This was a JOKE, and just goes to show why the NCAA must be reeled in now. They are out of control, unbridled "government".
Posted
VIP DONOR
Member since 2007
Posted
Wise Owl
Member since 2003
As for SMU…you can't compare something that happened 30 years ago to the UM case today. It's a completely different world in college sports in terms of money, technology, society, etc. And as you pointed out, SMU got such a harsh penalty because they were already on probation when their scandal occurred. Another way to look at it is that Penn State is going to lose 4 postseasons. What went on there is FAR worse than whatever happened at UM. So UM ends up with half of the postseason ban that Penn State received…seems like enough to me.
Besides, don't you think the NCAA would have loved to punish UM more? They obviously didn't have the evidence to do more or they would have. The case was based on the stories of a man who robbed hundreds of people out of their retirements. Sorry, but I just don't take him at his word.
Posted
Wise Owl
Member since 2012
Rick said
Are you familiar with what SMU got for $65K in booster payouts? Let me help you out…
The 1987 season was canceled.
All home games in 1988 were canceled.
The team's existing probation was extended to 1990.
Its existing ban from bowl games and live television was extended to 1989.
SMU lost 55 new scholarship positions over 4 years.
The team was allowed to hire only five full-time assistant coaches instead of the typical nine.
No off-campus recruiting was permitted until August 1988.
No paid visits could be made to campus by potential recruits until the start of the 1988–89 school year.
Granted they were on probation at the time, but it's not even close to being fair.
Miami was not hurt by refraining from playing in the post season.
This was a JOKE, and just goes to show why the NCAA must be reeled in now. They are out of control, unbridled "government".Posted On: Oct 22nd 2013, 4:50 PM #320000
And the general consensus of the SMU situation is that the penalties were too harsh…it took over 20 years for the program to recover from the "death penalty". They were pretty blatant, but SMU should not have had to suffer for 20 years because of the sins of the people from the mid 80's.
Control functions:
Recent Forum Posts
And Brian White is probably working around the clock to offer…
I'd imagine the team will hear what Coach Jakus has to say in h…
Can see online many Michigan fans think it's a foregone conclus…
Our bench play was so much stronger last year. Boyd, Weathersp…
Great watch. Thanks for sharing….Go Owls!