sick of this
Posted
#333829
(In Topic #46809)
VIP DONOR
Member since 2014
Posted
VIP DONOR
Member since 2005
For our OOC games, lets play Rutgers, Wake Forest, Iowa St, all on 1 n 1s, we have a shot and an even better shot of not setting an ncaa record for a** kickings
Posted
VIP DONOR
Member since 2014
teambeer said
CA didnt have a clue, had he still been around we would have another 5 years of these games. Its changing now, but takes years for scheduling changes to take hold.
For our OOC games, lets play Rutgers, Wake Forest, Iowa St, all on 1 n 1s, we have a shot and an even better shot of not setting an ncaa record for a** kickingsPosted On: Aug 31st 2014, 6:56 AM #333849
I was thinking more like playing an FCS school at home to open up every year, two games against teams from the MAC/AAC/SunBelt/MWC and then maybe one game against a lower level power 5 school that can still be a money game but we just wouldn't be getting paid as much. Maybe play at Indiana or at Kansas. It felt great opening up against Wagner two years ago and we actually expected to start the season off with a W
Posted
VIP DONOR
Member since 2012
Posted
Wise Owl
Member since 2012
LawOwl said
teambeer said
CA didnt have a clue, had he still been around we would have another 5 years of these games. Its changing now, but takes years for scheduling changes to take hold.
For our OOC games, lets play Rutgers, Wake Forest, Iowa St, all on 1 n 1s, we have a shot and an even better shot of not setting an ncaa record for a** kickingsPosted On: Aug 31st 2014, 6:56 AM #333849
I was thinking more like playing an FCS school at home to open up every year, two games against teams from the MAC/AAC/SunBelt/MWC and then maybe one game against a lower level power 5 school that can still be a money game but we just wouldn't be getting paid as much. Maybe play at Indiana or at Kansas. It felt great opening up against Wagner two years ago and we actually expected to start the season off with a WPosted On: Aug 31st 2014, 7:20 AM #333850
No thank you to FCS. Comparable Div 1 teams, but FCS does not get people in the stands. See Wagoner. And scheduling takes years to implement since they are generally locked down years in advance.
Posted
VIP DONOR
Member since 2009
Posted
VIP DONOR
Member since 2008
Posted
VIP DONOR
Member since 2014
GeorgiaOwl said
I agree but it coulkd be MUCH worse, we could be FIU - losers of 2 in a row to BC (NOT Boston College - ha ha!).Posted On: Aug 31st 2014, 11:52 AM #333875
Lol where that is true. The OOC schedule we have next year is more of what I'd like to see. The one pay out game vs. UF while hosting Buffalo and Miami and traveling to Tulsa. That's actually a dream scenario for scheduling from here on out. I really hope it's like that from next year on. I believe the only pay out game we have in 2016 is at Wisconsin so I hope Pat Chun keeps it like this moving forward because there's absolutely no reason to start 0-2 every season anymore. WE ARE NOT IN THE SUN BELT CONFERENCE ANYMORE!
Posted
Wise Owl
Member since 2004
owlmart said
I wouldn't mind a FAMU or BC game to open the year. I agree with money games being demoralizing.Posted On: Aug 31st 2014, 10:05 AM #333864
FAMU still owes us a home game. I want their entire band performing at halftime.
Posted
VIP DONOR
Member since 2008
Control functions:
Recent Forum Posts
Great watch. Thanks for sharing….Go Owls!
Two things I see are 1) Davis came off the bench mostly last y…
Seems like a great hire, quite a good resume!Welcome Coach!
Jakus certainly isn’t someone I had looked at while researchin…
This gives a little more confidence. https://www.youtube.com/l…