Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Skip navigation

New editorial from FAUOwl09

Add topic

Post

Re: New editorial from FAUOwl09

New editorial from FAUOwl09

CanadianOwl said

fauowl09 said

canadian: i took your first FYI as a joke and i thought it was funny… however, in response to your second post and reply to butterfly, i understand your feeling that its verbose and too long, but it is what it is… i said from the beginning, if it's too long, don't read it… these are my feelings and i was writing as it came to me, with no editing

No worries, I guess my university-system sarcasm was lost on some people.

But I do understand what you're saying, it's just that if you are submitting this to various "authorities" sometimes being overly wordy doesn't help you get your point across. That's all I was trying to say.

Remember… one must be able to comprehend before sarcasm can be appreciated…    ;D
Back to the top

Post

Re: New editorial from FAUOwl09

HOTEL said

Remember… one must be able to comprehend before sarcasm can be appreciated…    ;D

it is thought by some that "sarcasm is the lowest form of humor"…here's an interesting article…notice the sponsorship banner at the bottom ;D

Sarcasm the lowest form of wit demands the highest functions of the brain

Back to the top

Post

Re: New editorial from FAUOwl09

I appreciate sarcasm and I think most of us could do a better job of being less sensitive on this board.



Butterfly4 said

"FYI", how about you just read what he has to say and TRY to understand (sorry he writes ABOVE your level of comprehension).

You must not of been taught properly in Canada…




Constructive Criticism

Definition: Criticism or advice that is useful and intended to help or improve something, often with an offer of possible solutions.



Butterfly, why do you have to be such a douche?

Like things, love people.
Back to the top

Post

Re: New editorial from FAUOwl09

HOTEL said

CanadianOwl said

fauowl09 said

canadian: i took your first FYI as a joke and i thought it was funny… however, in response to your second post and reply to butterfly, i understand your feeling that its verbose and too long, but it is what it is… i said from the beginning, if it's too long, don't read it… these are my feelings and i was writing as it came to me, with no editing

No worries, I guess my university-system sarcasm was lost on some people.

But I do understand what you're saying, it's just that if you are submitting this to various "authorities" sometimes being overly wordy doesn't help you get your point across. That's all I was trying to say.

Remember… one must be able to comprehend before sarcasm can be appreciated…    ;D

I'm not an expert on the human brain, but is it possible that the part of the brain that controls excessive self-righteousness is blocking the part that can process sarcasm?  ;)
Back to the top

Post

Re: New editorial from FAUOwl09

fauowls44 said

HOTEL said

CanadianOwl said

fauowl09 said

canadian: i took your first FYI as a joke and i thought it was funny… however, in response to your second post and reply to butterfly, i understand your feeling that its verbose and too long, but it is what it is… i said from the beginning, if it's too long, don't read it… these are my feelings and i was writing as it came to me, with no editing

No worries, I guess my university-system sarcasm was lost on some people.

But I do understand what you're saying, it's just that if you are submitting this to various "authorities" sometimes being overly wordy doesn't help you get your point across. That's all I was trying to say.

Remember… one must be able to comprehend before sarcasm can be appreciated…    ;D

I'm not an expert on the human brain, but is it possible that the part of the brain that controls excessive self-righteousness is blocking the part that can process sarcasm?  ;)

I believe that's called the "butterfly effect"  :D

Like things, love people.
Back to the top

Post

Re: New editorial from FAUOwl09

I'm not being a douche…its obvious by reading what 09 writes that he truly cares about the school.  More then anyone else I have seen on this board. And because people can not write like he can, they have to bash him and make stupid remarks about it.  I'm not saying they have to agree with it, but to say something like, "FYI, editorials do not have to satisfy gordon rule" is pretty douche like to me, and make it sound like he is jealous because those words could never come out of his mouth.

I hope that editorial gets posted and I hope it hits home…somehow.

~B U T T E R~
Back to the top

Post

Re: New editorial from FAUOwl09

Butterfly4 said

I'm not being a douche…its obvious by reading what 09 writes that he truly cares about the school.  More then anyone else I have seen on this board. And because people can not write like he can, they have to bash him and make stupid remarks about it.  I'm not saying they have to agree with it, but to say something like, "FYI, editorials do not have to satisfy gordon rule" is pretty douche like to me, and make it sound like he is jealous because those words could never come out of his mouth.

I hope that editorial gets posted and I hope it hits home…somehow.

Can we all create pen names and just get crazy with it?  We can all be like little Thomas Jeffersons with the Federalist papers.

Teambeer is the most knowledgeable FAU sports fan I know, way smarter than me.
Back to the top

Post

Re: New editorial from FAUOwl09

i wish the gordon rule DID apply to papers people write for fun or something they are interested in… because all the gordon rule classes are B.S. and stupid… that's probably why i am in my fourth year of school and still lacking two classes in the gordon rule department, lmao

ERROR: A link was posted here (img) but it appears to be a broken link.

Back to the top

Post

Re: New editorial from FAUOwl09

fauowl09 said

florida owl: i'll address your questions tomorrow, promise… just got home from work and it's way too late to think right now, lol

still going to respond? :)
Back to the top

Post

Re: New editorial from FAUOwl09

Nice write up......hopefully we can put all this to an end soon, and then we can just debate on why the new coach isnt a good fit or why he is.....
Back to the top
Control functions: